Talk:Charles Glasser

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Plot Spoiler (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown. Their editing has included contributions to this article.

Untitled

Hi everyone, it's Charles! I'm looking for help with my page. Some rando set it up, there was some discussion out there about it being "paid for" (NOT!) but the point is the page is really incomplete and doesn't give a full picture. Of course, I know it's not a sales brochure, but we have the same interest: accurate and complete information for the public. Is there a Wiki editor who is willing to help? I can provide solid, verifiable info and sources for what's missing. Charles Glasser charlesglasseresq@gmail.com www.charlesglasser.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8C:C301:179:D0B0:93DA:3BD7:EAF5 (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi! I posted the above query to the noticeboard, and got a nice reply. There are some facts that need to be added, all with reliable sources, and I would like to add my picture (which is in public domain). The problem is I am not competent to make changes myself, I'm sure I would mess it up. It there someone I can send the info and citations to for addition? Thanks so much, Charles Glasser 2601:8C:C301:179:D0B0:93DA:3BD7:EAF5 (talk) 04:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to request changes here on this talk page. Please use the {{edit request}} template so that your request will raise a flag that attention is needed. With the request, it works best if you can give before-after text for the changes you are requesting and if they come with sources (you don't have to worry about formatting them, just make sure there's enough of a pointer so that an editor can find and verify them, then they can supply the citation coding). If you have a pointer to the photo, we can verify its status and upload it to Wikimedia Commons, after which it can be attached to the article. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the advice. I'll give it a go, and again, I *really* appreciate your patience! Charles2601:8C:C301:179:5DB9:7ABF:FE61:6298 (talk) 18:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The requested text's references are not formatted according to the citation style predominantly in use with the subject article (WP:CITEVAR). Any additions made to the article should have references formatted according to the style already in use with the article. Please see the Reply section below for more information about this issue.

Information to be added:

Extended content

"Charles J. Glasser Jr. is an American attorney, writer, educator and journalist with a background in financial and investigative reporting, libel privacy and freedom of information issues." [More accurate description of my practice area]

Information to be added: "He is also an adjunct professor of Media Law and Ethics at The New York University Arthur Carter Journalism Institute [3] and at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY. [Cite: https://www.journalism.cuny.edu/faculty/charles-glasser/ ]

Information to be added and better citation (in Writing and Commentary section): "Glasser is a contributor and commentator on free speech and media issues for a number of publications, including Instapundit,[12] The Daily Caller,[13] The Washington Examiner,[14] Talking Biz News[15] and Thomson Reuters. [16] Glasser appears frequently as an expert on media law issues in print and television, including I24 News, NPR, Forbes, Politico and other outlets." [Better citation to Daily Caller: https://dailycaller.com/buzz/charles-glasser/ ] [citations for appearances as expert: (I24) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Esu31faEvAI (NPR) https://www.npr.org/2017/09/15/551163406/fox-news-has-yet-to-explain-what-what-wrong-in-seth-rich-story (Politico) https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/14/arizona-senate-kelli-ward-fake-news-407281 (Forbes) https://www.forbes.com/sites/doliaestevez/2016/06/01/do-univision-and-netflix-have-to-pay-drug-lord-el-chapo-guzman-to-air-his-life-story/#634565835f22

Information to be added (in Notable Cases section): Doe v. Department of Mental Health, 699 A. 2d 422 (Me. 1997) Landmark case resulting in public's right to know about actions of state mental health workers who allowed the rape and murder of a woman under state care. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=825424990480190151&q=glasser&hl=en&as_sdt=4,20,145

Levinsky's v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 127 F. 3d 122 (1st. Cir. 1997) Establishing widely-cited federal case law that words such as "trashy" are not defamatory because they are clearly opinion and capable of many innocent meanings, given "the reality that exaggeration and non-literal commentary have become an integral part of social discourse." https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1829283622683595048&q=Levinsky+v+walmart&hl=en&as_sdt=6,31 and cited here: https://newenglandinhouse.com/2018/12/03/company-cant-bring-defamation-claim-against-blogger/

Cochran v. NYP Holdings, Inc., 58 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (CD Cal. 1998) Defended libal claims brought by celebrity lawyer Johnnie Cochran resulting in law that established greater protection for journalists to express opinion. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2464391358866414299&q=Cochran+v+nyp+Holdings&hl=en&as_sdt=6,31 and http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/virtual_disk_library/index.cgi/4909942/FID2663/common/first%20amendment/www.freedomforum.org/news/2000/05/2000x05x01x02.asp

Grammatical correction in Philanthropic Work section: He is also involved with the Committee to Protect Journalists, and Article 19.[11] He has provided pro bono advice and litigation support for freelance journalists.[18]

LINK TO PHOTOGRAPHS: Free for use under Creative Commons license: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dLpUlVMT5oFZ5j8BDde7gbKih0nZeohY/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/13epdYe9dfdH_XXnLRHFqy-VB1E22nnZs/view?usp=sharing

THANKS FOR THE HELP! Charles Glasser2601:8C:C301:179:9CFB:1A10:AD54:9AF2 (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 23-JAN-2019

Unable to review edit request
Your edit request could not be reviewed because the provided references are not formatted correctly.^[a] The citation style predominantly used by the Charles Glasser article is Citation Style 1 (CS1). The citation style used in the edit request consists of bare URL's.^[b] Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1. (See WP:CITEVAR.) In the extended section below titled Citation style, I have illustrated two examples: one showing how the edit request was submitted, and another showing how requests should be submitted in the future:

Citation style

Bare URL reference formatting:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337.3 miles,<ref>https://www.booksource.com</ref> while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.<ref>https://www.journalsource.com</ref> The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.<ref>https://www.websource.com</ref>

Displays as:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337.3 miles,^[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.^[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.^[3]

References

1. https://www.booksource.com
2. http://www.journalsource.com
3. http://www.websource.com

In the example above there are three URL's provided with the claim statements, but these URL's have not been placed using Citation Style 1, which is the style predominantly used by the Charles Glasser article. Using this style, the WikiFormatted text would resemble the following:

Citation Style 1 formatting:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337.3 miles,<ref>{{cite book|last1=Sjöblad|first1=Tristan|title=The Sun|url=http://www.booksource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2018|page=1}}</ref> while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Duvalier|first1=Gabrielle|title=Size of the Moon|journal=Scientific American|issue=78|volume=51|url=http://www.journalsource.com|date=2018|page=46}}</ref> The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Uemura|first1=Shu|title=The Sun's Heat|url=http://www.websource.com|publisher=Academic Press|date=2018|page=2}}</ref>
Displays as:

The Sun's diameter is 864,337.3 miles,^[1] while the Moon's diameter is 2,159 miles.^[2] The Sun's temperature is 5,778 degrees Kelvin.^[3]

References

^ Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 1.

^ Duvalier, Gabrielle. "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78):46.

^ Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 2.

In the example above the references have been formatted according to Citation Style 1, which shows the author, the source's name, date, etc., all information which is lost when only the links are provided. As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, larger edit requests such yours are generally expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review.

Kindly rewrite your edit request so that it aligns more with the second example shown in the collapsed section above, and feel free to re-submit that edit request at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions about this formatting please don't hesitate to ask myself or another editor. Regards, Spintendo 17:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

^ The fault for this formatting error most likely originated from the prompts used by the edit request template. These prompts ask the COI editor to "supply the URL of any references used". While this omission of information is not the fault of the requesting COI editor, it nevertheless remains their responsibility to supply the references formatted in the style used by the article.
^ The use of bare URLs as references is a style which is acceptable for use in Wikipedia. However, general practice dictates that the style already in use for an article be the one that is subsequently used for all future additions unless changed by editorial consensus.^[1]

References

^ "WP:CITEVAR - Wikipedia:Citing sources". Wikipedia. 20 October 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2018. It is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it.

Spintendo: Thanks for the tip. I'm not a coder, but will take my best crack at it. Again, appreciate your patience and help. Charles 2601:8C:C301:179:9CFB:1A10:AD54:9AF2 (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where is there a public domain photo? Can't find anything at Commons searching for "Charles Glasser".--SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

edit request

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Information to be added or removed: PUBLIC DOMAIN PHOTO WITH CC LICENSE: https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipNSqicnaspcr5v7LUdln_OmwGkzlnWMbDjTl2RtZ_HRY00a62KgmLkJzwiwqpaXfw/photo/AF1QipN4Vf4afvPUHZzcLdk6QLZbXdhsdm2T_qKdEPj4?key=d0tmVlQxWHpQb0g4S2dVRGFxSkVYUmhGS2NQOTRn CAN SOMEONE ADD IT, PRETTY PLEASE? CharlesGlasserEsq (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC) Charles CharlesGlasserEsq (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear image licensing. Although you can find that the image are under a CC license, it is not stated under which, which makes it unfortunally impossible to use them because different CC licenses might have different options regarding reuse (See WP:IUP for mmore Info). Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Schmidt (talk) Thanks much. I followed the instructions at WP:IUP and uploaded a photo that I owned and have deeded it over to Creative Commons use. If that's still not good enough. let me know, and thanks again for the help.CharlesGlasserEsq (talk) 19:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Schmidt CharlesGlasserEsq The photo licensing (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CharlesGlasser.jpg) appears to be fine now (CC 4.0), so I added it. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 14:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[noteFoot01a] Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 1.

[noteFoot02a] Duvalier, Gabrielle. "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78):46.

[noteFoot03a] Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 2.

[1] The fault for this formatting error most likely originated from the prompts used by the edit request template. These prompts ask the COI editor to "supply the URL of any references used". While this omission of information is not the fault of the requesting COI editor, it nevertheless remains their responsibility to supply the references formatted in the style used by the article.

[3] The use of bare URLs as references is a style which is acceptable for use in Wikipedia. However, general practice dictates that the style already in use for an article be the one that is subsequently used for all future additions unless changed by editorial consensus.^[1]

[2] "WP:CITEVAR - Wikipedia:Citing sources". Wikipedia. 20 October 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2018. It is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it.

[a]

[b]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[1]