Talk:Chicago Climate Exchange

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Untitled[edit]

It would be helpful for interested parties to know the founders and current officers of CCE, and how its profits are distributed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.236.162.44 (talkcontribs) 13:52, 22 March 2007.

It's not a very good article at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.244.171 (talk) 02:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Chicago Climate Exchange Logo-FAIRUSE.gif[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Chicago Climate Exchange Logo-FAIRUSE.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Chicago Climate Exchange Logo-FAIRUSE.gif[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Chicago Climate Exchange Logo-FAIRUSE.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Price chart needs revision[edit]

CCX price chart needs revision. It's way out of date and the ordinate seems to be unitless. DaveCrane (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)


Ownership[edit]

I've removed the Al Gore stuff - this page states that the CCX belongs to Climate Exchange plc, listed in London, which is being bought in April-May 2010 for £395m (about $600m) by a 100%-owned subsidiary of IntercontinentalExchange (ICE), according to this statement. So if you want to step into big Al's shoes you should buy shares in ICE.Red Hurley (talk) 11:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

User:Arthur Rubin why did you delete? Comments please, to save time for other's review and edits.[edit]

User:Arthur Rubin why did you delete? Comments please, to save time for other's review and edits. 209.255.78.138 (talk) 16:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

The first paragraph was unsourced and irrelevant, and the Controversy section was only quasi-sourced ([2] and [3] were not attached to any actual references, by the time I saw it) and are about living persons, so should be removed immediately under WP:BLP. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

2010[edit]

The companies joining the exchange commit to reducing their aggregate emissions by 6% by 2010.

Surely now that 2010 is here, they have a new commitment? It seems they've not updated their site either. —Internoob (Talk · Cont · Wikt) 23:34, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Making the article political[edit]

I see that the republicans got the blame for this sham being done away with. Does that mean that the article is saying that the people made a mistake by voting for republicans who clearly disagree with the global warming propganda used to start this exchange?

Im not a republican but I surely believe in the vote of the people and by stating that the republicans are to blame isn't the article really saying the people are to blame?Woods01 (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Add wikilink to general topic of Carbon pricing.[edit]

Add wikilink to general topic of Carbon pricing. 99.119.131.5 (talk) 02:11, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Why? It should link to carbon exchange or carbon trading; carbon pricing is only relevant through those, so should not be specifically linked in the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2011 (UTC)