Talk:Chief diversity officer

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

The content has been rephrased to de-emphasize the point that people turn to Diversity training University for certification. I can see how this is objectionable, but the point is that few professionals find themselves well-equipped for the job. They do turn to Diversity Training University International in an effort to learn what is needed to be less overwhelmed. But it is true that there are about three well known certification agencies. The interview quote from Billy Vaughn was used as a way to show an expert's experience. Hope this helps. Another concern is that the research section descriptions appear to highlight the authors Damon Williams and Katrina Wade_Golden instead of the research itself. This content is more appropriate in a biographical section rather than in an article about the chief diversity officer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonas bohman (talk • contribs) 19:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The last concern is solved. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damon A Williams. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be completely rewritten?

Unfortunately this article does not at all explain what a Chief Diversity Officer is and what responsibilities this officer has in the organization. The article only includes a brief historical background section that is of little informative value, and a "Credentialing" section which is also not informative (and was indicated to be promoting the subject matter in a subjective manner). If anyone could rewrite this whole article — this would be great! --DvirG (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chief diversity officer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091129103815/http://news.asianweek.com:80/news/ to http://news.asianweek.com/news/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]