Talk:China Labour Bulletin
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Possible copyvio[edit]
I left a message about this article at WikiProject China, and am reproducing the message here:
- I'm concerned about the provenance of the text at the China Labour Bulletin article, because the way it was formatted in a previous revision (before I cleaned it up) looks exactly like a cut-and-paste job. I have done some googling and can't find any other site with the same text, but I would still like to have some others look into this as well.
- And, I understand that it may be formatted like that simply because someone prepared the article off-wiki in Notepad and then pasted it in. But I'd just like to check to be safe. —Politizer talk/contribs 17:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment[edit]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:China Labour Bulletin/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
|---|---|
| I am the English website editor of China Labour Bulletin (CLB) and I would very much like to expand and update your entry on CLB.
When I attempted to do so earlier my comments were deleted and my newly created account was blocked. While I appreciate that you want your editors and contributors to be independent and objective, I’m sure you also want your entries to be accurate – currently the entry is out of date and contains factual errors. Since I am in the best position to provide the most accurate and up to date information about CLB, it seems only sensible that I be allowed to upload new information as and when required. Of course, anything I add can be challenged and I am more than willing to back up any claims made by CLB. In terms of verification, the best source again would be the CLB website. Of course I could cite the Financial Times or Wall Street Journal, quoting CLB but this seems a rather convoluted approach. I would appreciate any advice or guidance you could offer. Any comments should go to editor@clb.org.hk 202.181.180.72 (talk) 08:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | |
Last edited at 08:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 11:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on China Labour Bulletin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.china-labour.org.hk/ - Added archive https://archive.is/20121218133638/http://www.china-labour.org.hk/chi/ to http://www.china-labour.org.hk/chi/
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121218190634/http://www.china-labour.org.hk/schi/ to http://www.china-labour.org.hk/schi/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)