Talk:Chris Onstad

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Comics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Text and/or other creative content from Chris Onstad was copied or moved into Achewood with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled[edit]

I noticed that Chris Onstad alluded to the possibilty that he studied communications in college. Should this be added? He said it on his blog.

POV/Original Research/Verifiability issues[edit]

A lot of this reads like promotional copy. I'm not sure what the running commentary in the article is verifiable or sourcable, as well. --sigmafactor 02:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Influences and biographical information are best.

Removing the main body of the article entirely seems a radical step. Granted, it was problematic, but surely some of it could be saved. john k 17:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]