Talk:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Medicine / Translation / Pulmonology (Rated GA-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Translation task force (marked as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (marked as Top-importance).
 
Note icon
Information from this article appears on Portal:Medicine in the Did you know section.
WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

September 11 attacks aftermath[edit]

I'm a casual Wikipedia user, so forgive me if this is way off base. The article quotes "The number of deaths is projected to increase due to higher smoking rates and an aging population in many countries", should we also mention the increasing amounts of COPD due to surviving the 9/11 attacks? I just feel like it could be a good addition.

2605:A601:287:B301:99CA:9B8D:51CC:704B (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

To include this, we would need a very strong secondary source. It bears remembering that "only" at most 100,000 people were exposed to the fumes, which pales in comparison to those exposed to cigarette smoke and smoke from indoor domestic fires. JFW | T@lk 18:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Refs[edit]

Need page number for the book

"In 1953, Dr. George L. Waldbott, an American allergist, first described a new disease he named "Smoker's Respiratory Syndrome" in the 1953 Journal of the American Medical Association. This was the first association between tobacco smoking and chronic respiratory disease. [1][2]"

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Page 6.-gadfium 03:10, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  1. ^ Waldbott, George L. A Struggle with Titans. 1965. USA
  2. ^ Waldbott, George L. M.D. "Smokers' Respiratory Syndrome. A Clinical Entity." Journal of American Medical Association. 151:398. 1953.

Types[edit]

Centriacinar vs panacinar COPD doesn't seem to be mentioned. Should it be? WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Stem cells[edit]

Have reverted to [1] as stem cell therapy is not supported for human use at this point in time. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

agree (could add [2])--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes thanks User:Ozzie10aaaa another really good review. Have added it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

What do I need to do in order to add information on stem cell therapy to the research section? Ckennerly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckennerly (talkcontribs) 14:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

You need to use recent high quality sources that are actually about the subject in question. We can than discuss what is a fair summary. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

What is considered recent? ckennerly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckennerly (talkcontribs) 19:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Last 3 to 5 years. Than you need to accurately reflect the sources in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Alright, so for clarification a source between 2010 and 2015 would be acceptable? ckennerly

So Doc James , I just want to be clear, as you've previously stated, I need to use "high quality sources" within the last "3 to 5 years" meaning the oldest source I can use should be no older than 2010.ckennerly
We use the best available sources. There are some rough guidelines on what counts as good.
We than discuss how to summarize these with appropriate weight. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:09, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Doc James can you provide the link for those rough guidelines? User: ckennerly
Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Hyperinflation[edit]

We discuss it under pathophysiology. Not sure this duplicate content in the section on exacerbation supported by a "letter" is needed.

"Additionally some patients suffer from hyperinflation. These patients are dyspnoeic, with hyperinflated lungs, and without an infectious or eosinophilic pattern. These patients can be treated differently, for instance with longacting bronchodilators. [1]" Using long acting bronchodilators for acute exacerbations of COPD is controversial. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Have removed this again as COPD exacerbations are not typically treated with LABAs and the source is a commentary not a review article "although there is reason for longacting bronchodilators as well. [2]" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Ref is not saying that long acting agents are appropriate for acute exacerbations but that their long term use can prevent hyperinflation which is somewhat different. Adjusted to reflect [3] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)