Talk:Civica Rx
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Biased language
[edit]Parts of this article read like advertising copy: "These numbers continue to grow as Civica moves from a start-up to a well-established societal asset, serving more patients every day." Phrases like "well-established societal asset" aren't appropriate for an encyclopedia, at least not without lots of evidence sources. This phrase doesn't have any. Greeninkdrama (talk) 13:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- I added the NPOV language template to the top of this article, as described here. Please let me know if this is incorrect, I'm still new to Wikipedia editing. Greeninkdrama (talk) 13:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Start-Class pharmacology articles
- Mid-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles