Talk:Claranet
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References
[edit]Ideally the references in the article should not be press releases from the company itself, but a third party commentary. MRSC • Talk 09:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Added some external references. Tripper (talk) 13:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
wwe
[edit]the wwe is a good hing!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.140.209.215 (talk) 11:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Point of View
[edit]This Claranet article uses a lot of 1st party (same company) sources related to things they're doing, and uses language like "revolutionising the IT market in Portugal" without explaining it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webash (talk • contribs) 17:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)