Talk:Classicism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This is a really poor article. Someone please improve it. Perhaps use the articles on classicism in other languages to help? Also some distinction needs to be made in English between classicism and neoclassicism. The section on Shakespeare and French classicism is particularly egregious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.2.223.89 (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Untitled[edit]

A stub is an article that is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of the subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. To qualify as a stub it must at least define the meaning of the article's title. Often that means three to ten short sentences, but less text may be sufficient to qualify as a stub for articles on narrow topics, and complicated topics with more than ten sentences may still be stubs. However, in reality, many articles which are labeled as stubs are much longer than that. You can help Wikipedia by removing inappropriate stub notices.


Untitled[edit]

The poet Lord Byron, most famous for "She Walks in Beauty" played a very important role in the movement of Classical Poem — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.126.162 (talk) 07:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


Classical Art[edit]

I think somebody has to add a part about Clasical Art in this because Classicism affects art. Molière should be mentioned as one of the first playwrights that broke this rule, at least in "Dom Juan"

Most importantly...[edit]

"...it brought about polytheism, or "paganism". 1. How did a belief in Classicism bring about a religious conversion? 2. Why is it the "most" important? No attack on Classicism nor on the Pagans, but it seems like a non sequiter. 76.90.236.113 (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Added template[edit]

... to tie subjects together.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)