Talk:Claws Mail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

POV[edit]

"Speed" and "reliability" are POV. So is "powerful search and filtering". It smells like an advertisement. And please do not revert content tags without discussion, it's very rude. - Sikon 13:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Incomplete[edit]

A bunch of missing info (POP, IMAP, LDAP, etc.) can be found in Comparison of email clients. —Jerome Potts (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Developers should be removed[edit]

Long list of non-notable developers should be removed, because they aren't notable people. Just because I don't agree with that big list of names, doesn't mean you can slander me with the "censorship" word. • SbmeirowTalk • 18:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Namechecking --- Don't add people who have not been proven to pass WP:BIO to articles without a really good reason. --- Listing the names of all the members of an orchestra, all the employees of a small business, design studio or college department does not necessarily add to a reader's understanding of the topic.SbmeirowTalk • 18:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

You claimed censorship, so knock it off. • SbmeirowTalk • 17:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

@Sbmeirow: Let's do this methodically, shall we? Please tell me (even if you feel doing so is a repetition): Exactly what policy or guideline in Wikipedia does forbid inclusion of developer names? If you must, please both link and quote. If it is not a policy or guideline, but common sense that compels you, please explain that reason to me, and please tell me to what extent that reason would apply to other stuff in the infobox, such as version number. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 21:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

@Sbmeirow: I am afraid without answers to this question I cannot possibly support you. You have obviously not been absent, so please re-consider responding. Thanks. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 09:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)