Jump to content

Talk:Commission on Information and Communications Technology (Philippines)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal

[edit]

Merge Department of Information and Communications Technology (Philippines) to Commission on Information and Communications Technology (Philippines) since CICT and DICT have similar functions. The editor may have noticed that the article about CICT exists. SkyHigher (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Leaning towards Oppose. IMO, those are two different agencies created by two separate legislations. Would be better to just link the predecessor to the new department as the main article under its history section.--RioHondo (talk) 03:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now. Better to link the CICT article as a preceding agency to preserve its history rather than cluttering the new article's page. Xeltran (talk) 07:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. A unified article can be edited to sound more consistent and fluid, so that cluttering can be avoided. We cannot deny that the CICT was established solely with the purpose of being the precursor or "egg" for a DICT, that has now since hatched. RepublicaNegrense (talk) 12:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Commission of Information and Communication Technology seems to be unrelated with DICT.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 18:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commission on Information and Communications Technology (Philippines). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Commission on Information and Communications Technology (Philippines). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]