Jump to content

Talk:Communist Party of Italy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled section

[edit]

Dear Ghepeu, you wrote "most of the pages linking here refers to the Communist Party esisting during and after the WWII". So you redirect "communist Party of Italy" to "Italian Communist Party". Then if you are right, you have to edit the "errors" in the pages where someone wrote "communist Party of Italy" but thought(!) to "Italian Communist Party". If we are making something with a sense, and Wikipedia is something with a sense, if some page has a link with the name "Communist Party of Italy" then it has to be linked to "Communist Party of Italy" and not to "Bugs Bunny".--Tompint 01:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou Ghepeù, for signalling. I rectify the wrong links.--Tompint 11:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to decipher intent of the author

[edit]

The last couple paragraphs are hard to copy-edit because it is impossible to divine the meaning of the writer.

Specifically: The program A new concept of party The Coming of “Bolshevization”

StNicksRocks (talk) 04:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Italian Communist Party?

[edit]

This article seems to be talking about the same party as Italian Communist Party under different names. I suggest a merger. Ltwin (talk) 07:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were two new parties founded in 1943. Some ex-members of the PCd'I founded the PCI, and some founded the PCInt, the Internationalist Communist Party. Both in some ways could claim to be the successors of the PCd'I, so I'd argue that they should all be considered as different parties. 82.7.178.188 (talk) 13:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be rewritten by someone who understands the political issues involved, and whose native language is English

[edit]

The English here does not really make sense. But it's not possible to correct it, as the author's intent is not clear, as a previous commenter pointed out. I think --- think --- that the author wants to justify, by anticipating, the PCI's turn to 'Eurocommunism' many decades later. But that's not entirely obvious. It really needs a re-write.Doug1943 15:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug1943 (talkcontribs)