Talk:Composite Higgs models

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 4 December 2014 by reviewer Huon (talk · contribs).

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"These scenarios are the leading alternative to supersymmetric models for physics beyond the SM presently tested at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva"

What is this supposed to mean that they are the leading alternative to SUSY for BSM at the LHC? That they are the most worked on BSM other than SUSY at the LHC? Because this isn't even close to true, composite higgs analyses are pretty rare.

205.175.106.115 (talk) 14:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

POV

"The hope that informative collision energies may be within reach makes it important that the LHC move forward with upgrades in luminosity and energy in search for any new clues that might be obtainable." This looks like an opinion or argument to me. 198.98.200.181 (talk) 01:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]