This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
I believe that the terminology of "Republic of China" should be removed. The Taiwan Relations Act, a US law, does not recognized the terminology of "Republic of China" after Jan. 1, 1979. Hmortar (talk) 10:16, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The list is 'as of 2009', and has fallen quite out of date. I recommend removing it, as there is an external link which seems maintained; alternatively, is there a way to create a dynamic table sourcing from the FAPA site? An additional alternative source would be the official website of each representative / senator and verifying their caucus affiliations. What is most in the spirit of Wikipedia? Jhelphenstine (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
