Talk:Constitution of North Korea

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV

Unsourced descriptive terms in the article have a definite slant. E.g., people's dictatorship, martial law, and more. Article needs cleanup.--S. Rich (talk) 20:37, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced content

@Migs005: why have you removed sourced content about amendments in this series of edits? Personally, I think recounting each amendment is a logical way to organize this article. Furthermore, some amendments (like the establishment of Eternal President, removal of the word "communism") are very important, get loads of coverage in sources, and should be expanded, not removed. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Having the amendments is great, but what I notice is that there's often no way to know what was there before. So there's the mention that the national anthem changed, but it's the same one in the main part of the article and no indication of what it was before. Doubtless that's somewhere else on WP, but.. Lovingboth (talk) 10:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be rewritten

It needs better style, it needs functional links (some of them don't work now), etc. 190.219.8.12 (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]