Talk:Copperbelt

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Zambia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Zambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Zambia.

'Copperbelt' should be one word

The normal spelling is one word, whether referring to the name of the province specifically or to the mining area in general. You never see it as two words in the Copperbelt towns. Google searches throw up 4 times as many pages for 'Copperbelt' as 'Copper Belt' and most of the latter pages refer to belts made of copper or copper mining areas in Vermont and Arizona. I tried to rename the page to 'Copperbelt' but someone has already redirected a page of that name to this one and I can't do it. Can an administrator please change it and get rid of "Copper Belt" which does not apply to Zambia.Rexparry sydney 07:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC) <<comment removed>>[reply]

Copperbelt is also congolese

The geological copperbelt includes most of the time the katangien part too, even if the production in DRCongo is far lower than Zambia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AxKo (talk • contribs) 14:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why the spurious accuracy in the coordinates?

The copperbelt is, I am led to believe, big. Really big. So why the need to specify its coordinates to five decimal places? That implies an accuracy of 1.1m, and I know it's bigger than that ...

I've also taken the liberty of removing the final comment after the first talk topic: any Wikipedian who thinks that 'f*ck u' is an appropriate response to a serious discussion should be banned from editing. --Wally Tharg (talk) 23:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Seems like Copperbelt and Katanga Supergroup cover roughly the same topic. The former is more colloquial, the latter more technical geological terminology, but I think both could be best handled in the same article. 〈 Forbes₇₂ | Talk 〉 09:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge They do overlap in coverage. Joyous! | Talk 23:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]