Talk:Corporation for Public Broadcasting/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
POV
This article needs to be revised to eliminate POV. The opening discussion about "forcing" mergers, and the asserted reasons therefor, is simply and categorically false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.212.61 (talk) 20:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Republican Dominated?
3 Republicans 2 Democrats 1 Independent
Sounds like it's 50% Republican.
- The comment above is from 08:39, July 7, 2006 Dubc0724. Dubc- sign your comments. The phrase "republican dominated" made more sense prior to Tomlinson's resignation, when there were 4 republicans. If you take a look at CPB's actions, especially under Tomlinson, there is undoubtedly a bit of a right-wing agenda, but yes, maybe "republican dominated" is not accurate at the moment. Personally, I wouldn't bother changing the phrase since there will be a clear republican majority again as soon as Bush gets around to making appointments. --Osbojos 21:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Logo Idents
If no one protests, I'm going to delete this section. It strikes me as irrelevant, and raises issues of WP:RS, WP:TRIV, WP:V, and WP:OR.--Osbojos 04:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo.png
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Board updates?
In the article, the information about the CPB board seems pretty outdated - one section says presently (as of May 2007) and another gives the current membership as of February 2007. Is it possible to get more up-to-date information about the membership? Has an appointment been made? lithium3141 (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Chris Boskin, Chair
Beth Courtney Vice-Chair
Gay Hart Gaines
Lori Gilbert
David Pryor
Bruce Ramer
Elizabeth Sembler
Ernest J. Wilson III
(one vacancy)--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Logo
It says in the article that the new logo has been in use since 2003. However, while searching the Internet Archives, I discovered that the new logo had been used on CPB's website since 2000. GlobetrotterUltima (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
This is a "private" corporation?!
I don't see how the above phrase can be correct, when it is applied to an organisation which: has an "annual budget ... composed almost entirely of an annual appropriation from Congress"; was set up by the US government and; has a board made up of members appointed by the White House! Grant | Talk 09:38, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- I have some problems with this too. This is like saying the fed or the post office is "private." Can I suggest adding the modifier "Quasi" in front of the word private? Onefinalstep (talk) 03:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm going to go ahead and put the 'quasi' modifier in the article. No one has commented. Onefinalstep (talk) 02:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Funding of NPR
This article currently asserts that the CPB partially funds NPR. That is a popular misconception and untrue. See http://www.npr.org/about/aboutnpr/publicradiofinances.html
The CPB provides partial funding for public radio stations (10.1% of station revenue) The CPB provides partial funding for the PBS Television Network.
- No, actually NPR receives grants from the CPB. On the very page you linked to, it describes that funding to NPR:
- Grants from institutions such as the Ford and MacArthur Foundations, and non-profits such as the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) have made it possible for NPR to maintain its current programming and to launch new programs and initiatives.
- In addition, much of the CPB funding to public radio stations is returned to NPR to pay for programming. Drrll (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
More on funding
See this: [1]. Please explain removal.Miradre (talk) 19:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Because it doesn't match the source and isn't about the CPB. aprock (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- See table 1 and the line "State & local tax-based" as well as "Federal grants & Contracts". It is a report by CBS who obviously considers such information relevant since they repeatedly mentions what sources are tax-based and not.Miradre (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120616055247/http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_050605_cpb.html to http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_050605_cpb.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120214072309/http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_071505_elephant.html to http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_071505_elephant.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061028135758/http://www.cpb.org:80/aboutpb/faq/pays.html to http://www.cpb.org/aboutpb/faq/pays.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)