Talk:Cramp & Co.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Development

Try Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. --do ncr am 18:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

negative tag

An editor has repeatedly added a negative tag, about one source. There are two sources in the article. An edit summary indicates ignorance about the sources, and perhaps a commitment to edit warring for no reason related to development of the article. I removed it. --do ncr am 05:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has repeatedly removed an article improvement tag about insufficient sourcing without actually addressing the issue raised in the tag. To an indiscriminate database source, the editor has added one actual document that is referred to by the indiscriminate database source. The editor has further proceeded to attack the other editor, as seen above and in edit summaries such as "stupidity". --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]