Talk:Critical Path, Inc.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article smells too much like marketing-speak and not a true Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.245.97.154 (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very marketing-ish. Marked with neutrality problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50n0m4 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This looks like it was lifted right out of their marketing material. If this were true Wikipedia article it should discuss the history of the company, the executives that went to prison and the resulting emergence of a viable company after the dotcom bust. 204.40.1.129 15:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through and stripped out most of the marketing "fluff". Hope this helps. 146.145.245.163 (talk) 17:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tnanks, UTC -- It must have been really bad before!

Anyone (knowledgeable) want to comment on the recent BT Mail fiasco? Wyresider (talk) 00:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]