Talk:Curtain wall (architecture)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Pictures
[edit]This artical needs pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.169.244 (talk • contribs)
too much modern emphasis
[edit]way too much emphasis upon modern curtain walls! Anlace 21:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
non-NPOV tone
[edit]Before I start editing, Ahering@cogeco.ca, could you try rewriting your recent edits? The tone employed ("are essential", "areas must have") is more instructive than informative. I do like the LAPD citation. I also worry that you're taking a very limited, first-world perspective in your sweeping statements of requirements ("glazing panels are often required" "The curtain wall itself, however, is not ordinarily required to have a rating"). Please include just WHERE these requirements exist - I doubt very much that the majority of countries across the globe have such stringent requirements, and can't know just where you're talking about without further information. Alvis 05:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
too much modern emphasis? non-NPOV?
[edit]Curtain walls are, historically and almost by definition, modern and first-world. The bit about "medieval" curtain walls is interesting, but perhaps it's confusing to people coming to this from outside of architecture and structural engineering. It sounds like there's a stylistic choice to be made (you've got your medieval hand-crafted curtain walls and your filthy modernist first-world curtain walls). I came across this article by chance, and I think it's excellent--you just need to underline that the modern and medieval terms are entirely different concepts.--84.48.122.132 19:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- What about traditional Chinese architecture? This article is linked from the Dougong article, which describes traditional Chinese architecture as using non load-bearing curtain walls. If that is correct, then perhaps the History section of this article should mention that. If not, then the Dougong article should be corrected. 168.244.164.254 (talk) 15:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Dead Link
[edit]The external link entitled "Curtain walls in 20th-century architecture" no longer links to its intended destination, the site has been moved. 137.92.97.111 (talk) 00:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- The link should be removed as the article is about "glass" curtain walls, which is totally removed from an outer defensive curtain wall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.65.105.39 (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
The Liverpool Buildings are added
[edit]The world's first glass curtain walled buildings were in Liverpool. Oriel Chambers being the first. These have been added.
Just to note. The glass curtain wall came about because of industrial building innovations in metal frames in England in the late 1770s and early 1800s. In 1858, Greene's Boat House, Sheerness, Kent, England was the first building with a true rigid metal frame, with no load bearing masonry. This building was a four storey, three bay frame 64 metres by 41 metres by 16 metres high. This wiki explains it well: http://www.liverpoolwiki.org/Home_of_the_Skyscraper
First Interstate Tower fire
[edit]The section on fire safety made the following statements about the First Interstate Tower fire:
In the case of the aforementioned fire, it was specifically the activation of the newly installed sprinkler system, which halted the advance of the fire and allowed effective suppression. Had this not occurred, the tower would have collapsed onto fire crews and into an adjacent building, while on fire. Exceptionally sound cementitious spray fireproofing also helped to delay and ultimately to avoid the possible collapse of the building, due to having the structural steel skeleton of the building reach the critical temperature, as the post-mortem fire investigation report indicated. This fire proved the positive collective effect of both active fire protection (sprinklers) and passive fire protection (fireproofing).
This conflicts with the United States Fire Administration report[1] (which states that the sprinklers were never turned on and the structural integrity was never in danger), so in the absence of a citation I moved them to the talk page. The comment about passive protection of the steel skeleton is supported by the report, but perhaps not directly related to curtain walls.
- ^ "Technical Report, Interstate Bank Building Fire". United States Fire Administration. Archived from the original on 2010-07-13. Retrieved 21 November 2009.
Reason for dab
[edit]Something approaching half the links to the original curtain wall article were from castles and fortification, which was clearly wrong, so I have turned that into a dab page. We should now be able to unravel the links in slower time with the help of the dab notification system. Hope that helps. --Bermicourt (talk) 17:25, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Curtain wall (architecture). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131106070925/http://www.alueurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/CPR_guideline_Dec_2012_ver-1.pdf to http://www.alueurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/CPR_guideline_Dec_2012_ver-1.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212185221/http://www.ul.com/fire/joint.html to http://www.ul.com/fire/joint.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607042604/http://www.alueurope.eu/publications-building/ to http://www.alueurope.eu/publications-building/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)