Talk:Cutco Corporation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Companies (Rated Redirect-class)
WikiProject icon This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Redirect page Redirect  This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.


This page was nominated for speedy deletion. While it is a tiny page with no references, this company is clearly the holding of several divisions that all have Wikipedia pages. I think it should be kept, renamed to its current name of Cutco Corporation, and have some references added. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 23:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

I disagree, Alcas corporation has apparently changed it's name already to Cutco thus, I think that deletion is appropriate. Cutno (talk) 01:23, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Deletion Warning[edit]

I have not seen significant evidence yet as to why this article should not be removed. I asked that this please be discussed before Friday, July 24th 2009 or I will nominate this article for deletion again. Cutno (talk) 00:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

It may be a good idea to merge/redirect to Cutco.. especially since they've actually changed the name of the parent company to Cutco. If you do nominate for deletion again, please use WP:PROD or WP:AFD, as the article does assert notability as the parent of three notable companies, making it ineligible for speedy deletion. --Versageek 01:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Sure, I'm all for merging with Cutco, as long as it is clear that that page describes both the cutlery brand and the parent company. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 13:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree. Anyone disagree? Cutno (talk) 19:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Article has been merged per consensus here and talk:Cutco. G6 applied. Phearson (talk) 18:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I was asked to delete the redirect but did not do so. It must be kept to preserve the article history, and has been so marked. DGG ( talk ) 18:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)