Talk:Cyclone Fantala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Fantala/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 09:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria[edit]

  • Well-written:

    • With the issues below addressed, the article fully complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as general structural layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
  • Verifiable with no original research:

    • With the issues below addressed, the article makes full use of its substantial bibliography of reputable sources, with no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
    (c) it contains no original research
  • Broad in its coverage:

    • The article seems to cover all encyclopedically relevant aspects of its topic for which verifiable information is available. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

    • The article maintains a neutral approach to its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

    • The article does not appear to have been subjected to disruptive editing behaviours since its creation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

    • All three images used in this article are public domain, and thus their usage does not risk fair use violation. All three images are suitably captioned and relevant to the article. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

    Comments[edit]

    • In the introduction's second paragraph, it says, "... making its closet approach to Madagascar." Is this supposed to be "closest approach", or is "closet approach" a term in meteorology?
    • Oughtn't the last sentence in the third paragraph of "Meteorological history" to have a citation?
    • In the second paragraph of "Impact and records", it says, "Only four buildings withstood the estimated 350 km/h (220 mph) gusts, and even then, with moderate damage,[44] which were constructed to be cyclone-proof after Bondo in 2006." For better sentence flow, I would recommend rearranging as: "Only four buildings, which were constructed to be cyclone-proof after Bondo in 2006, withstood the estimated 350 km/h (220 mph) gusts, even then sustaining moderate damage." Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Upon the completion of this review, I believe the article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    External links modified[edit]

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just modified 12 external links on Cyclone Fantala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

    This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    External links modified[edit]

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Fantala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

    This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Track of Cyclone Fantala[edit]

    Then track is outdated. SpicySweets (talk) 19:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cyclone_Fantala&oldid=1211214820"