Jump to content

Talk:DRDO Rustom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seperate article for the Rustom II?

[edit]

Now that the Rustom II is close to being real (This is being posted post defexpo14) maybe it deserves it's own article? Clubbing it with a technology demonstrator like Rustom I fails to demonstrate the massive difference in level of accomplishment. Rushil92 (talk) 17:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DRDO Rustom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DRDO Rustom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DRDO Rustom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on DRDO Rustom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with TAPAS-BH-201

[edit]

This is Rustom 2 a variant of Rustom UAV. The article has quite a few issues, does not have enough sourced information on its own and should be merged with parent article. Can be forked off if enough content is available at a later stage. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge There is substantial overlap between the subject of the two articles. It looks like the new article was created mainly because of a name change. Rustom-H, Rustom-II, Tapas 201 and TAPAS-BH-201 all refer to the same UAV and should be under the same article. Gazoth (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Combat capability

[edit]

Hey Gazoth, I copy-edited the information on Rustom 2 and added some information on it's capabilities and latest roles. The official PIB release says little ([1]). Most newspapers which state that it has a recon and surveillance role ([2], [3]) but there is one which states that is also a weapon capability ([4]). IMO this is an aberration and a possible error/lapse on their part and I have thus omitted it. Do you have any opinions on this? Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamgerber80: Both FlightGlobal and Jane's only mention surveillance capability. However, an Aviation Week and Space Technology report dated 25 October 2010 mentions that an armed variant is expected. The report doesn't go into much detail about the armed variant "Rustom-C" apart from what you can see in the preview. There is also a quote from a DRDO official, which is the same as the first quote in TAPAS-BH-201 article. So, it looks there there might be a future variant that will be combat capable, but the version that is currently flying is surveillance only. Gazoth (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:DRDO_Rustom&oldid=1201651095"