Talk:Daddy K

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Nigeria Low‑importance

	Nigeria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Everything I wrote about him is from my research online and I found them on reliable sources. I didn't formulate anything and also the article was written from a neutral point of view. There are a lot of significant coverages about the subject which can be found in the references I cited on the page, moreover, I don't know him so there is no reason for me to add promotion content to his page.Zilonfire (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (Everything I wrote about him is from my research online and I found them on reliable sources. I didn't formulate anything and also the article was written from a neutral point of view. There are a lot of significant coverages about the subject which can be found in the references I cited on the page, moreover, I don't know him so there is no reason for me to add promotion content to his page.) --Zilonfire (talk) 15:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I think at minimum should be regular AFD, some of the sources look good, such as the Sun and Vanguard. -- Expertwikiguy (talk) 01:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]