Talk:Daimonic

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ancient philosophy

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2007-09-20 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Overall I think the article is good although I think it could be fleshed out more, and that last section with the diagram needs references. I'm aware that James Hillman has written about the daimon and the daimonic, although I haven't yet read his work. Is there anyone who has who can add to the article?

I've added James Hillman to the 'See Also' section, and also the related article on the Daemon (mythology), which overlaps with this one. --Kavita9 (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article merging

I do not support the article merging. I think this is a big enough topic to necessitate having its own article. It can be linked to the demon/demonic articles, but should not be merged since they are different topics. --98.218.46.137 (talk) 02:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, specifically in that a daimonion is a spiritual force, not a Judeo-Christian "demon" of sorts. To elaborate, a daimonion can be a source of inspiration, as it was to Socrates throughout his life. 72.83.117.211 (talk) 15:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the previous posters. These are VERY different topics. Speaking from a psychological perspective, Rollo May has consistently used the term daimonic as a concept designed to rival those of "devil" and "demonic". As May says, the term devil "is unsatisfactory because it projects the power outside the self and opens the way for all kinds of psychological projection." See the book "Meeting the Shadow" for further explication. --1000Faces (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merging/splitting

That this article would exist is more fitting in a dictionary than an encyclopedia. Since there is already an entry on Dæmon (which references this article's title when explaining the Greek etymology of the Latin spelling "dæmon"), I propose that those parts of the article which refer to Greek mythology be merged into the Dæmon article, while the other meanings can be moved to their appropriate pre-existing pages, merged into other pages where appropriate, or given their own subject pages (for example "Daimonic (psychology)"). If it turns out that there are a number of uses of the term "Daimonic" which warrant separate pages, then this article itself should be converted into a disambiguation page. --Kalle Clemens (talk) 17:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]