Jump to content

Talk:Danyal Chaudhry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2024

[edit]
World No 1 strategist (talk) 23:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

theres false information linked throug some wrong articles that needs to be removed.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RudolfRed (talk) 01:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Form 47

[edit]

The mention of form 47 is a false information regarding a government National Assembly candidate its done by a opposition party article writer named saqib,plus danyal Chaudhary has been set free from thd case as court didn’t find any evidence. please fix this 154.192.30.70 (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chrisbroad34 (talk) 20:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False information

[edit]

how can you references articles which are older then 5 months … please remove “ 47 mention and ch adnan case false information as i can provide the lastest information 154.192.30.70 (talk) 01:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

154.192.30.70, I've removed vandalism. — Saqib (talk) 10:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are biased and you are supporting to Mr. Daniyal that actually did not win the election based on form 45. We must maintain integrity when writing about living person Chrisbroad34 (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Provide proof of form 45 otherwise it shows either you are close relative of Mr. Daniyal or you are impersonating Chrisbroad34 (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth and Wikipedia:No original research. — Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: Regarding this: DAWN states In a surprise move... and that ...is being considered a surprise move by .... Maybe we need to reword it neutral? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My view is that unless you phrase that as a quote or paraphrase in-text attributed to DAWN, it still doesn't fit wiki-voice, it's newspaper-language. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gråbergs Gråa Sång, Can you please convert it into a quote, because IMO it is an important aspect. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[1] acceptable? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gråbergs Gråa Sång, Perfect. Thanks! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False information

[edit]

What proof do you want when someone is in the government,ask the government and that’s enough proof, “ Old news articles being cited by saqib , this fellow is truly unprofessional and a political supporter not professional. Wikipedia is losing its worth and saqib you cults like will be exposed soon. Unprofessional writers should be exposed 2407:D000:8:979F:A8D7:F929:BF53:3044 (talk) 01:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid personal attacks. --Saqib (talk I contribs) 05:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]