Talk:Darkchylde

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: United States Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Biased source

Huge chunks of this page read like a bloviating puff piece. The reason is obvious: the main source for a lot of this page's content is the creator's own website; hardly an unbiased source. If another source can be found about how Darkchylde is supposedly more popular than Buffy and better selling than Spider-Man, so be it, but until then I'm removing these references. jayunderscorezero (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an apology

I'd like to remove the term "apology" as what Mr. Queen posted was in no way an apology. I believe it would be better to be more specific/accurate by stating something along the lines of "Mr. Queen expressed difficulties in his personal life and believes(ed?) that his original response to the criticism was wrong.

He said he made a mistake based on his difficulties, he did not apologize for the mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnytherocketstar (talk • contribs) 21:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just repeating what the source stated. Arstechnica's title "DMCA mea culpa: Randy Queen apologizes for response to criticism [Updated]" calls it an apology, and since we go by the sources, we'll call it an apology too. Tutelary (talk) 21:34, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, Clearly I'm new to this soooo...Anyway liked the other edits. Thanks for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnytherocketstar (talk • contribs) 23:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tumbler controversy, why here?

It seems to me that the section "Tumblr depictions and subsequent DMCA takedown notices" does not belong to an article on the fictional character Darkchylde. It should be moved to a page on Randy Queen, the author, or the page on the website Tumblr. Kileytoo (talk) 20:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]