Talk:Daybreak (painting)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Mbpresent.jpg
[edit]Image:Mbpresent.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Dimensions
[edit]I can't find the dimensions of the painting, and am annoyed by the xxx by xxx centimeters that stood so long in the article. Until I can go to Newport and verify the size, I think we should leave that part out. J S Ayer (talk) 02:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Penguin dreams and stranger things.jpg
[edit]The image Image:Penguin dreams and stranger things.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
claim dubious
[edit]I find the "most reproduced image" claim highly dubious. Firstly, the ref is dead. Secondly, it's sales in the US are unlikely to make it the WORLD'S most reproduced image. That honour may in fact go to Chinese Girl, but I doubt there are accurate figures for any image really. Malick78 (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daybreak (painting). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070211183835/http://www.americanillustration.org:80/html/press/press_7_5_06.html to http://www.americanillustration.org/html/press/press_7_5_06.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)