Talk:Deb Hoffmann

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've noticed the feedback on the article about Deb - I tried to follow similar Guinness World Record holders pages for how I wrote the article.

As Guinness World Record holders seem to garner quite a bit of notoriety, I felt that Deb made a great subject for Wikipedia. With the number of interviews she did while in England this past year, I felt this was the time to submit Deb to Wikipedia.

Are there other guidelines I should have been aware of before posting? Other Guinness World Record holders in some cases had much less in their pages.

I think the problem here is that there is too much subjective writing. To pick one example: "It is probably the comfort level that came from performing in front of people while DJing..." "Probably" is a very obvious weasel word here and the whole thing is fluffy preamble to what might be a valid point about something she did. I'd be happier with this is it was a significantly shorter article.

Anyway, don't panic. This isn't up for deletion. If you pare it down to just the verifiable facts then it may well be OK. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have shortened the article and removed fluff from the article. I've also included an infobox on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisPeters-FF (talk • contribs) 16:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've also added categories - can I remove either the issues box or the need more categories box in the articles? --ChrisPeters-FF (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)talk[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deb Hoffmann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304232724/http://www.oxfordspiresrotary.org.uk/content/events-2014-15 to http://www.oxfordspiresrotary.org.uk/content/events-2014-15

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]