Talk:Dendropsophus branneri

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dendropsophus branneri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Frogboi123 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Qazwsx1515, Emily486103, Hoonji2022, JackRuvin0, Yarlagaddas.

— Assignment last updated by Eurquhart02 (talk) 21:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Updates to page

I have added the following sections to this page: Description (adult, tadpole), Habitat and Distribution, Conservation (Habitat loss), Phylogeny and close relatives, Diet, Mating (breeding season, male/male interactions), Enemies (predators, parasites), and Vocalizations. Frogboi123 (talk) 19:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Dendropsophus branneri

• ... that Dendropsophus branneri males have a special "fighting call" reserved for combat with other males? Source: https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v44n1.88112
  • Reviewed:

5x expanded by Frogboi123 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC).

• New enough, long enough, and no copyvio detected by Earwig. The hook appears to be sourced, although I can only read the abstract. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 08:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
  • I've got the full paper here, and can verify the hook fact. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review

I noticed that there was some information left out in the male-to-male aggression article such as cost to aggression, so I added them in. I also included more information on habitats and adaptivity. There were also a few minor typos which I modified. Overall, I think this article is well written and organized clearly such that everything flows well. Emily486103 (talk) 22:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review

I think the information of the frog being able to live and breed in a wide variety of habitats was very interesting so I added that information to the lead section. Overall, I think this is a very good article with a lot of interesting information that is well organized. Qazwsx1515 (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review + Comments

Great work on the frog entry! I particularly enjoyed the discussion on habitat loss and the frog's breeding behaviors near the end. I went ahead and revised the information in the "habitat and distribution" section by checking and revising sources. I also added some extra hyperlinks and removed any redundant information to make the section more insightful and concise. Some suggestions to improve the entry would be to maybe include information on any frog predatory defense mechanisms and conservation methods against habitat loss in the Atlantic forest. Hoonji2022 (talk) 04:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review

For the most part after the first read through, I thought that the article was written very well. I think in some sections you did a phenomenal job in thoroughly explaining some pieces of information and concepts. I edited a few grammatical and spelling errors that I saw. I thought the organization was fairly decent. Typically I think conservation should be at the end, but since it is about habitat loss it flows well. The section about habitat loss is very well written and includes a great amount of detail. I thought for the most part the sentence structure and paragraph structure were both very solid. I went through and tried to edit to make some areas more clear and concise. Sometimes some areas got a little redundant or slightly difficult to understand. I also thought the section about vocalizations was very intriguing. However, the first few sentences deal with the numerical data around the vocalizations that are hard to make sense of for the average reader, maybe including reference examples or an example of what that sound is like would be beneficial. There were also a few portions that I saw data and information that seemed to have came from a scholarly source that I did not see a citation for. I think running through and making sure all pieces of information that you used was cited could be beneficial. Another factor I think that would help enhance the paper is the addition of images of the frog that capture all the features described in its description. Images along with captions help the reader visualize the frog and associate an image with the information they are reading. An image of a map that displays the distribution of the frogs for example would be very beneficial for visualization purposes. Other than the few grammatical errors or portions that were slightly difficult to understand, the entire article was filled with very detailed and unique information. Very good job. Yarlagaddas (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Fun fact😂

South Africa has the most diveres and unique floral kingdom in the world ,And 70%of the cape floral kingdom occurs nowhere on earth. In the months of November to January you can swim with whale sharks inthe gulfof tadjourag in djibouti. Rhino horns are now being poisoned to prevent poaching the poison is non toxic to the animals however any posioned horn that is poached will show up on airport scans and whatever powder tea or creamis then made will result un a bitter taste and possible burns. It takes 1 minute longer to boil an egg in Johannesburg than in cape town and Durban this is because joburg is 2000m above sea level where the air is less dense 41.116.85.79 (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)