Talk:Dewey: The Small-Town Library Cat Who Touched the World

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Iowa Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).

Extensive editing underway[edit]

This article was a mess, with reviews attached to different books or editions than they purportedly referred to, among other issues. I have tried to sort out the different editions: adult, primary children, middle-grade readers, audio books, sequel (Dewey's Nine Lives), and create appropriate sections of this article, as well as to cite the appropriate review to each edition (as were included on that page.) It would be a good idea for editors to look for other articles about this publishing phenomenon. As with the Globe and Mail, probably some mainstream media reported on this in addition to reviewers from library-associated journals.Parkwells (talk) 21:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]