Talk:Diamond DA62

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diamond DA62 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Certification

The aircraft is EASA certified - see http://www.diamond-air.at/media-center/press-releases/news/article/diamond-da62-receives-easa-certification.html --Epinay LA (talk) 20:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I have added that ref and the exact date! - Ahunt (talk) 11:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomenclature

Since this aircraft was renamed for certification and production I was considering whether the article should be moved to DA62, or split. I am thinking that it might make the most sense to split it into DA52 and DA62, once production of the DA62 commences, leaving the DA52 article as the story of the prototype. - Ahunt (talk) 12:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. MilborneOne (talk) 16:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Never Exceed Speed

I'm not sure what the correct Vne (Never Exceed Speed) value is for this aircraft, but whatever it is, it will be specified in Indicated Airspeed (IAS), not True Airspeed (TAS). This is either a typo or the wrong value. Cvkline (talk) 04:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It must have been a typo,

Fixed - Ahunt (talk) 16:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]