Talk:Diego (bishop of Oviedo)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diego (bishop of Oviedo) → Diego (bishop) – Wikipedia has only one article on a bishop called Diego, therefore premature disambiguation to bishop of Oviedo is not needed. The current page outlines the the possibility of other bishops of that name and is therefore the ideal target for the Diego (bishop) link. Targeting Diego (bishop) to Diego is pointless at that article has no information on any bishops. Tassedethe (talk) 04:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Lots of other bishops named Diego: Diego Salcedo (bishop), Diego de Acebo, Diego Ramírez de Guzmán, Diego Salcedo, etcetera. Ucucha 12:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- But not uniquely known as Diego. Diego (bishop) should have a hatnote to Diego (given name) for these other people. Tassedethe (talk) 13:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - He is not the only bishop known uniquely as Diego, though perhaps the only one with a WP article yet. So oppose. Srnec (talk) 23:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - See Diego (bishop of León) and Diego (bishop of Ourense). —Srnec (talk) 02:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ucucha. It's too common a name for this kind of limited disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, but only because of the articles that were recently created by Srnec. Jenks24 (talk) 20:24, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.