Talk:Diet for a New America
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
58 album
[edit]The primary article for Diet for a new America was just redirected to the book's page, stating that the book is more notable. However, I would argue the album is more notable, as is the article since this article is one line with only one reference? I would suggest that either this article is improved or the default for Diet for a new america should be the album.
What are everybody's thoughts? I shall wait a month for opinions before completing the switch.
On another note, not that it really matters, but has anyone else noticed the only listed source is a scan on Google books of Vegetarian Times from August 1989? Surely there are better sources than that... Drmotley (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree. A bestselling book which was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize is more notable than a single album rock band. Please do not switch without achieving consensus. Feel free to add "better sources" to the article if you wish (see Google Scholar, The New York Times and Los Angeles Times). Nirvana2013 (talk) 15:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- "Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize" is meaningless. I can nominate the authors of this article for a Pulitzer. If I didn't hate paperwork, that is. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- I have amended the sources. Nirvana2013 (talk) 16:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)