Talk:Dilectissima Nobis

European Microstates: Vatican City Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vatican City portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as Mid-importance).

Christianity: Texts / Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Low-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lack the a neutral point of view

This article lack the a neutral point of view, since argue the "anti-Catholic" character of the government. A careful reading of the "Dilectissima Nobis" states that the main issues that the catholic church were facing in Spain were: -Their properties becoming property of the Spanish state -The separation between State and Church -The expelling of the Jesuist (remember that Jesuist didn't accept the rules of the State, only the rules coming from Rome) -The secularising of education

All the points but the first are common in today states, and no one will qualify them as anti-Chatolic, and the first point should be related to the far left policy of the government. It could it also be noted the pro fascist and pro Nazi character of the Pope Pius XI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.246.132.178 (talk) 11:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is not much question that the Spanish Republican government was rigidly anti-clerical, and that in 1936 this anti-clericalism developed into a campaign of crude violent anti-Christianity whose foundations had been pretty well laid by 1933. As for Nazis, they had only very been in power about 10 weeks when "Dilectissima Nobis" was issued, and there was no noticeable Nazi-Catholic alliance before they came into power. There was no overt fascism in Spain in 1933 either. It's fair to criticize the Catholic church for what it was actually often guilty of -- narrow devotion to an old social order, tenaciously clinging onto its landholdings, anti-Jewish bigotry, etc. -- but labelling it "fascist" is lazy and semi-stupid... If the Church allied itself with Franco after 1936, the Republicans have no one but themselves to blame for that, since they used every possible method to drive the Church (and all believing Christians who took their faith seriously) into Franco's arms. If they didn't like the results, then maybe they should have done something different to start with. AnonMoos (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dilectissima Nobis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101005090028/http://www.vatican.va:80/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_03061933_dilectissima-nobis_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_03061933_dilectissima-nobis_en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]