Talk:Doosan Enerbility

Image copyright problem with File:Doosan.svg

The image File:Doosan.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Daewoo Heavy Industries

Daewoo Heavy Industries has been redirected to this site from Daewoo, but there is no indication in reference for Daewoo Heavy Industries at this page. Rjluna2 (talk) 11:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion

@Piotrus:. This article was PRODed for the reason: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you," I contest this proposal as controversial. [Google News https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=Doosan+Heavy+Industries+%26+Construction&oq=Doosan+Heavy+Industries+%26+Construction&gs_l=news-cc.3...1725.1725.0.2102.1.1.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1ac.1.#hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0&tbm=nws&q=%22Doosan+Heavy%22] provides enough search results for WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Therefore I remove the PROD tag. Beagel (talk) 10:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

User:Beagel - can you integrate those sources into the article? As of now it has zero reliable references. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

I added some information from these sources, but this article needs more work to be done. Beagel (talk) 14:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121029074644/http://www.doosanheavy.com:80/young/ to http://www.doosanheavy.com/young

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 15 December 2016 (UTC)