Jump to content

Talk:Double Shah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Random stuff

[edit]

This was at the bottom of the page, does it mean anything to anyone?

he had come from dobui with a idea that in case of doble mony he makes 20,000,000 rupees and runaway but look the people interest he can't stop his lust this news tell us his best friend and bussiness partner. waheed janjua uk wala

Lucaswilkins (talk) 00:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

[edit]

This scam is called both a ponzi scam and a parimid scam which contridicts the definition of a ponzi scam.--Wilson (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

[edit]

I suggest this article be moved into the List of Ponzi schemes article on the grounds of Notability (or lack thereof). I also question the choice of name for this article: why is the article named Double Shah and not Syed Sibtul Hassan Shah? Additionally, if the article is supposed about this subject (as I assume by the article's title which I presume to be an alternative name), why is a description of another person's scheme included here.--~ ~ : Lincoln Cooper : ~ ~ (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Double Shah plenty of notability you can go a Google news search on it. The Determinator p t c 02:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Method

[edit]

I want to know what sort of a ponzi scheme was this. It has no information about how he went about doing his business and how did he defraud people. Was he really earning some sort of money? Was he not? Was this just like any other typical type of ponzi scheme? This article should have more details about his method.

~ ~ : srhzaidi : ~ ~ (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Double Shah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Double Shah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]