Talk:Duke of Suffolk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Whose arms?[edit]

The arms are neatly described, but I'm curious: Did all three creations use the same coat? GeorgeTSLC (talk) 17:37, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No they didn't. Those described belonged to the Greys. The de la Poles used "Azure, a fesse between three leopards heads, or". The Brandons used "Barry of 10, argent & gules, over all a lion rampant, or, crowned per pale, of the first and second" (Source: Burke's extinct peerage) Kjhskj75 (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Duke of Suffolk[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Duke of Suffolk's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "burke":

  • From Earl of Lincoln: Mosley, Charles, ed. (2003). Burke's Peerage, Baronetage & Knighthood (107 ed.). Burke's Peerage & Gentry. pp. 2337–2440. ISBN 0-9711966-2-1.
  • From Earl of Stamford: Burke, John (1833). A General and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerage and Baronetage of the British Empire. H. Colburn and R. Bentley. pp. 473–476. Retrieved 9 December 2016.
  • From Wilfred Stamp, 2nd Baron Stamp: Burke's Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage, 1939. Burke's Peerage Ltd. p. 2299.
  • From Earl of Suffolk: Mosley, Charles, ed. (2003). Burke's Peerage, Baronetage & Knighthood (107 ed.). Burke's Peerage & Gentry. p. 3814. ISBN 0-9711966-2-1.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 03:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]