Talk:Duty to protect
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
USA-centric
[edit]This article fails to mention whether this duty exists in non-U.S. legal systems. --Eastlaw (talk) 05:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Police duty to protect
[edit]Should add a section about this. Heard about this on RadioLab- several court cases have established that the police have no constitutionally mandated duty to protect any citizen from harm. Need reliable ( law review &other) sources, of course Lexein (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- My gut reaction is that this should go in a separate article because it's distinct from this because i. this is about mental health and ii. i think violating confidentiality is such a core part of this principle that adding things without this violation of confidentiality could mislead; iii. there is something very specific about simultaneously encouraging people to be completely open about their thoughts and feelings and then giving a clinician freedom to judge this information and divulge it to the police. Talpedia (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- Stub-Class psychiatry articles
- Low-importance psychiatry articles
- Psychiatry task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Stub-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Stub-Class Disability articles
- WikiProject Disability articles