Talk:Dweeb

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 10 October 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dweeb → Dweeb (disambiguation) – The current Dweeb page is a disambiguation page; a proper destination Dweeb (disambiguation) already exists, presently only as a redirect. The pages' roles should be reversed. Wikiuser100 (talk) 13:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 13:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Considering the fact that there is no primary topic, this page should not be moved per WP:DABNAME. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 13:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikiuser100: If so, which is the dominant meaning, to move it to name Dweeb? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - No obvious WP:PRIMARYTOPIC._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, there is no primary topic which would make dweeb redundant if this page were moved. Per the last paragraph at WP:DABNAME, the redirect (Dweeb (disambiguation)) isn't a "proper destination", only it exists to indicate any intentional links to the disambiguation page, to distinguish them from accidental or erroneous incoming links that should be disambiguated to the appropriate article –72 _(talk) 21:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The primary topic is the dicdef. Everything else is too obscure. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as every single term listed is too obscure to have the non-identifier title. ToThAc (talk) 15:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.