This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
I do not believe "This should be a part of Eliot Spitzer" is sufficient reason to delete the stub. It does not cite any particular policy or guideline. There was consensus on Talk:Eliot Spitzer that the main article, Eliot Spitzer, needed to be trimmed. I think we've been getting too far away from FA guidelines. 50k is enough for the main piece, the stubs don't detract from it but contain enough information verified through third party sources to remain on their own, in my opinion. It is the same as any other large article, see George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, etc. Mrprada911 (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
