Talk:Eileen and Robert Mason Pollock

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/robert-mason-pollock-dead-dynasty-912943 Hollywood Reporter obituary
http://codfoundation.org/hot-topic&newsID=190 Endowment from Bob and Mike

2 NOT 1[edit]

THIS SHOULD BE TWO FUCKING PGS, NOT 1. THEY ARE INDIVIDUALS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.104.73 (talk) 03:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, why the anger and language? They are individuals, but the article is a stub, they are only notable as a couple/writing team, and all available references/credits (right now) are of them as a couple. Why have two identical/redundant stubs at this point? Sheesh. — TAnthony^Talk 03:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the latest "split" tag, I see no reason for 2 identical stubs. Even if expanded, I can't imagine there will be enough notable and sourced individual info worthy of separate articles. There are plenty of other combined articles, some of which are even more extensive and notable, like the Kray twins. — TAnthony^Talk 08:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]