Jump to content

Talk:Electricity (Silk City and Dua Lipa song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleElectricity (Silk City and Dua Lipa song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starElectricity (Silk City and Dua Lipa song) is part of the Dua Lipa (album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 16, 2020Good article nomineeListed
September 5, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Dua Lipa: Complete Edition

[edit]

How does this song not promote Dua Lipa: Complete Edition? Lipa announced the reissue before this song was released, and this song was released the same day as "Want To", a promotional single from that album. Just because she isn't the first artist listed doesn't mean it doesn't promote her album. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 13:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

[edit]

Dance-pop

Piano house

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Electricity (Silk City and Dua Lipa song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 23:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hey LOVI33, it's been a while since we talked! I will review the article today! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 23:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;

Remove ""Electricity" was met with acclaim from music critics." The Ultimate Boss (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. LOVI33 01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have re-worded most of them into paraphrasing. I hope its okay. LOVI33 01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    1. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  1. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
  2. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

Are you sure you need to include all of the information about the song charting in the UK? "t. It spent a total of 20 weeks on the chart, with 7 being in the top 10, 9 being in the top 20, and 10 being in the top 40" The Ultimate Boss (talk)

Removed so now it states that it spent 20 weeks on the chart. LOVI33 00:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    1. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  1. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  2. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  3. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  4. Overall

LOVI33, Yes, it's the critical reception, sorry I forgot to mention that... The Ultimate Boss (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Boss, I have addressed all your concerns. Let me know if you want me to do anything else. LOVI33 01:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LOVI33, Everything looks good! I'm going to  Pass this! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.