Talk:Elwyn Watkins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Watkins v Woolas?[edit]

As per the discussion in the failed AfD, does anyone want to have a go at a Watkins v Woolas article on the election court case and surrounding context? It might then, as per WP:ONEEVENT, be appropriate to re-direct from this article to the new one. The best starting material is probably what's in the Phil Woolas article. Bondegezou (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think if articles about election petitions are desired, then the name should be in the form '(Constituency) election petition, (Year)'. That's because the naming of the court cases is not consistent; normally they are in the form of Petitioner v Defendant but sometimes they appear as 'Re Parliamentary Election for (Constituency)'. There are also associated actions which are not cast in the same name, for example Phil Woolas' judicial review, and Phylip Hobson's appeal against the striking out of his petition against the Kensington by-election. O'M & H, which doesn't specifically encourage any style, seems to have unwontedly encouraged people to use the form '(Constituency) case' (sometimes with Petitioner v Respondent following), because it uses this form to head its chapters. Sam Blacketer (talk) 13:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elwyn Watkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Elwyn Watkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]