Jump to content

Talk:Emma Hollis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleEmma Hollis has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 16, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Emma Hollis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 02:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

[edit]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Good
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Good
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Good
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Per definition
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Fine
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Fine
7. Overall assessment. Pending

Comments

[edit]

1

[edit]
  • "Hollis is a young special agent within the Federal Bureau of Investigation. During the show's final year, she was partnered with offender profiler Frank Black (Lance Henriksen). The character of Hollis was portrayed by Canadian actor Klea Scott, who joined Millennium in its final season." -- Perhaps make it clear immediately that the character was introduced in the final season.
  • "written off as the hallucinations of Henriksen's character Frank Black" - We learn that Henriksen played Black in the above section. Trim, perhaps?

2

[edit]
  • Added a CN tag after a direct quote
Thanks for looking over this one for me. If you're concerned about notability I could add a few extra secondary sources to help establish that. Several of them don't really add additional material, but I could double up some of the refs to help to establish a wider level of critical recognition if you think that would be useful. I think I've address all of your concerns specifically listed, let me know if there's anything else you feel could be amended. GRAPPLE X 14:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]