Talk:Enlargement of the United Nations

International relations: United Nations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Image:United_Nations_member_countries_world_map.PNG

This bot has detected that this page contains an image, Image:United_Nations_member_countries_world_map.PNG, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at File:UN Member Countries World.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 15:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Future enlargement

What restrictions are placed on states wishing to join the UN? Is there a vote in the General Assembly? The Security Council? Do the veto powers apply? --Khajidha (talk) 13:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A new member has to receive approval from both the General Assembly and the Security Council, and veto powers apply. More information can be found at Member states of the United Nations. Chanheigeorge (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've read that and it still doesn't give much detail. I assume that the required number of votes in the Security Council is nine, as it is for everything else, but what number/percentage of votes is necessary for the General Assembly vote? Simple majority (>50%) or some form of super-majority (2/3?, 75%?, 90%?). Checking the General Assembly page I see that it is 2/3 of those "present and voting", but a page titled Enlargement of the United Nations should really have a section detailing the process step by step. --Khajidha (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find more details, feel free to add to this article or at the article member states of the United Nations. I have not looked much into the procedural aspects of admission, as I think in reality the General Assembly always votes positively when the Security Council recommends membership; the real power behind whether a membership application is approved (or even gets on the agenda) lies in the veto powers. Chanheigeorge (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated map needed

The map needs to be updated to take account of South Sudan becoming a member. Davshul (talk) 06:28, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Security Council resolutions

As we actually have articles on a great number of UNSC resolution, I'll be adding them here. I have a short spell of free time to do this, I probably will not finish, soo... hopefully someone will finish this.--... there's more than what can be linked. 09:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kuwait

There seems to be no Security Council resolution advising the General Assembly the admission of Kuwait. The transcript of the GA session admitting Kuwait is downloadable here, and there it says that the "Security Council has quite recently unanimously recommended (1034th meeting) the admission of ... Kuwait." - this meeting falls between SC Resolutions 178 and 179. Does this mean that there is no resolution for Kuwait? Could have the UN General Assembly admitted Kuwait without a formal Resolution? I don't get it... --... there's more than what can be linked. 19:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Short Form or Long Form Names?

Should we use the short form or long form names of the countries? The point is that while a number of countries changed their short name, a larger number changed only their long name. For example, Yugoslavia was called the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia (1945-63), and then the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ('63 onwards), and this change is not noted here, as the country is only named as Yugoslavia. So do we add all the long name changes as well? I am aware that very few people visit this article, but a second opinion would be most appreciated. --... there's more than what can be linked. 19:50, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Map Error

The map shows the Republic of China as a "original member". however, they are not currently a member state of the U.N. 24.187.19.109 (talk) 05:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why do people always think that... The UN recognises the People's Republic of China as the legitimate representative of all of China, and that includes the island of Taiwan. On the other hand, the Republic of China, despite having de facto control only over Taiwan, claims ALL of China. Hence, Taiwan does not equal Republic of China no matter which side of the argument you take. Plain and simple. For details you can start by reading China and the United Nations. --

\color {Blue}{\mathcal {M}}

\color {Blue}{\vec {(e\ ,}}

\color {Blue}t)

= ? 10:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enlargement of the United Nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140712192515/http://www.un.org/en/members/growth.shtml to http://www.un.org/en/members/growth.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1991 Belarus and Ukraine

India appears in 1945, but not on independence in 1947. Belarus and Ukraine also appear in 1945, so following the same pattern should not appear again on independence from the USSR in 1991. I have removed them.--2A00:23C6:148A:9B01:4446:349D:6F6C:1972 (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]