Talk:Enrique Campos del Toro

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Damiens edit

I have reverted THIS edit per WP:LR. Do not enter into an WP:EDITWAR because you can be blocked from editing, and discuss it here instead per WP:CONSENSUS. Mercy11 (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mercy11. What exactly in WP:LR justify you removing that tags? Also, please notice that by just reverting my edits instead of acting upon what is debatable, you accidentally removed other stuff I added. Is that also related to the rotten links? Would you gently fix that? --damiens.rf 14:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Place {{dead link}} after the dead URL and just before the </ref> tag if applicable, leaving the original link intact. Placing {{dead link}} auto-categorizes the article into Articles with dead external links project category, and into specific monthly date range category based on |date= parameter." Mercy11 (talk) 14:44, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I got it. Just as a suggestion (if you allow me), you could have raised my attention to this specific mistake, instead of blank-reverting all the page just saying WP:LR. It could save us some time. And by reverting, more than just the {{broken link}} tags were removed. Better be careful. But thanks anyways. I'll fix that. --damiens.rf 14:54, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't happen to see time savings the way you do. In any event, you made additional changes to the page HERE while this discussion was still ongoing -and- without reaching a consensus FIRST as stated by policy. I will let it go this time, but I suggest you follow policy in the future. Mercy11 (talk) 15:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The page wasn't blocked for editing. My changes where to (1st) implement your suggestion about the {{broken link}} tag usage (thus, consensus reached) and (2nd) to do things unrelated to what was being discussed here.
- If you actually believe I broke any policy, report it somewhere to someone. Saying you'll "let it go this time" sound as a menace. --damiens.rf 15:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, I have used your suggestion and you have been reported HERE. (You have also been notified in your talk page.) Mercy11 (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

El Diario de Puerto Rico

What's "El Diario de Puerto Rico"? A newspaper?

This used to be the previous name of newspaper, El Nuevo Día (according to Wikipedia). But Campos del Toro could not have founded it in the 40s. --damiens.rf 15:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]