Talk:Enrique Campos del Toro
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Damiens edit
[edit]I have reverted THIS edit per WP:LR. Do not enter into an WP:EDITWAR because you can be blocked from editing, and discuss it here instead per WP:CONSENSUS. Mercy11 (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, Mercy11. What exactly in WP:LR justify you removing that tags? Also, please notice that by just reverting my edits instead of acting upon what is debatable, you accidentally removed other stuff I added. Is that also related to the rotten links? Would you gently fix that? --damiens.rf 14:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- "Place {{dead link}} after the dead URL and just before the </ref> tag if applicable, leaving the original link intact. Placing {{dead link}} auto-categorizes the article into Articles with dead external links project category, and into specific monthly date range category based on |date= parameter." Mercy11 (talk) 14:44, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I got it. Just as a suggestion (if you allow me), you could have raised my attention to this specific mistake, instead of blank-reverting all the page just saying WP:LR. It could save us some time. And by reverting, more than just the {{broken link}} tags were removed. Better be careful. But thanks anyways. I'll fix that. --damiens.rf 14:54, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I don't happen to see time savings the way you do. In any event, you made additional changes to the page HERE while this discussion was still ongoing -and- without reaching a consensus FIRST as stated by policy. I will let it go this time, but I suggest you follow policy in the future. Mercy11 (talk) 15:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- The page wasn't blocked for editing. My changes where to (1st) implement your suggestion about the {{broken link}} tag usage (thus, consensus reached) and (2nd) to do things unrelated to what was being discussed here.
- If you actually believe I broke any policy, report it somewhere to someone. Saying you'll "let it go this time" sound as a menace. --damiens.rf 15:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I don't happen to see time savings the way you do. In any event, you made additional changes to the page HERE while this discussion was still ongoing -and- without reaching a consensus FIRST as stated by policy. I will let it go this time, but I suggest you follow policy in the future. Mercy11 (talk) 15:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I got it. Just as a suggestion (if you allow me), you could have raised my attention to this specific mistake, instead of blank-reverting all the page just saying WP:LR. It could save us some time. And by reverting, more than just the {{broken link}} tags were removed. Better be careful. But thanks anyways. I'll fix that. --damiens.rf 14:54, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- "Place {{dead link}} after the dead URL and just before the </ref> tag if applicable, leaving the original link intact. Placing {{dead link}} auto-categorizes the article into Articles with dead external links project category, and into specific monthly date range category based on |date= parameter." Mercy11 (talk) 14:44, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- OK, thanks, I have used your suggestion and you have been reported HERE. (You have also been notified in your talk page.) Mercy11 (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
El Diario de Puerto Rico
[edit]What's "El Diario de Puerto Rico"? A newspaper?
This used to be the previous name of newspaper, El Nuevo Día (according to Wikipedia). But Campos del Toro could not have founded it in the 40s. --damiens.rf 15:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Puerto Rico articles
- Low-importance Puerto Rico articles
- Start-Class Puerto Rico articles of Low-importance