Talk:Equestrian statue of Mark Cubbon

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in India may be able to help!

Merge proposal[edit]

Instead of being a standalone stub that gets barely any views, I think the content here should be merged into the articles Attara Kacheri and Cubbon Park. The statue is far more notable as a landmark within Cubbon Park than it is on its own. W. Tell DCCXLVI (^{talk to me!}/_c) 03:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an expert in the subject area, but I would also agree with a merge for the exact same reasons. – GnocchiFan (talk) 12:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No need for a merge, sourced and a fine 1866 statue - although a mention, link, and image should be placed at the pages mentioned. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Most likely the article just needs to be expanded, not merged. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another Believer, good plan. There is actually more information at the subject's page, including a prank vandalism incident uncovered the day the statue was unveiled. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]