Talk:Esteban Carpio

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Journalist

Journalist Diane Dimond commented, "That looks to me, like brain damage time.". A Journalist is a journalist, not a medic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.226.229.234 (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Veracity?

I removed the question in the article stating: "Is it possible to fall three stories onto your face, and then evade police for forty five minutes?" Doesn't meet neutral point of view. Postmortemjapan 14:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FBI Investigation

Something should be said about the questionable finding by the FBI that there was no police wrongdoing. You can't land on your face from three floors up, sustain that kind of injury, and run away. 74.79.205.3 19:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It could be possible to evade, if you just find a good place to hide. Does anybody have a link to the complete FBI finding? Rebelyell2006 19:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The F.B.I. "finding" might have been as simple as choice not to prosecute, which would make it some obscure internal document. You might be able to email his lawyer and ask him if you really wanted it... Int21h 21:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed swearing

I deleted a comment using an expletive: "$%@ animal should have gotten the death penalty." 72.82.19.4 03:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All-White Jury

I deleted someone's entry about this being about race ("an all white jury found him guilty"). Sorry for people who feel bad for Mr.Carpio, but there's no evidence race played a factor in the jury's decision. 71.192.51.33 15:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That comment does not imply race played a factor in the jury's decision. It imples an all white jury found hime guilty. Some people and organizations happen to find those things (called facts) somewhat important (like the NCAAP, etc). Int21h 21:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it was an all-white jury that convicted Carpio. While there is no evidence to suggest race being a factor in the jury's decision to convict, the racial makeup of the jury was without question. [1] 24.23.211.206 17:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea neither desire to know rights and wrongs here (I am SO far from any culture biz), but I will not allow arbitrary deletion of facts that backed by references. If someone believes that a particular statement in the article is false, please explain why in the talk page... 137.5.10.140 13:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FBI AGAIN

Why does the article state that the FBI found the cops "not guilty"? When did the FBI become a judiciary agency? This article stinks of bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.133.230.1 (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I partially agree, the statment should be removed. First of all, the statement is uncited; I cannot find any reference saying as much. Second, the F.B.I. does not decide guilt. As for bias, I disagree; the article is short and concise. The comment does imply misconduct (regretfully) but, in my opinion, so does the photo of his face. Reminds me of the domestic violence cases when the husband says of his badly brused wife: "she fell down the stairs." Int21h (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Esteban Carpio arraignment.jpg

Image:Esteban Carpio arraignment.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Esteban Carpio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]