Talk:Evert–Navratilova rivalry

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

Tennis High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Walkovers/ WTA list

In the WTA Head-to-head given in the article it lists the walkovers, which I think is valid but which is also official. Why do you think it should not be in? Alonsornunez (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because a walkover is like the match never happened for wins and losses purposes, and no source counts them. You, however, are wrongly insisting on saying that Evert won a match when Navratilova didn't play it. That's patently incorrect. Tennis expert (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's how it's listed by the official WTA head-to-head. Why ignore the official way the list is laid out? Alonsornunez (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WTA does not credit Evert with a victory over Navratilova in the example I gave above. You, however, are doing so. That's simply wrong. Tennis expert (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm simply following the WTA's precedent in listing them in the head-to-head. Alonsornunez (talk) 21:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're not. You're saying that one player won and the other lost during a walkover. Tennis expert (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)0[reply]

Third Opinion: Greetings! I see that someone requested a WP:3O about this dispute. Having researched the issue (and in addition to being a longtime tennis fan), I believe Tennis expert has the better argument here. The WTA's website lists the rivalry at 43-37 in Navratilova's favor. Neither of those numbers includes walkovers (neither Evert's walkover win in Orlando in 1975 nor Navratilova's walkover win in Washington in 1981). GreenGourd (talk) 21:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evert–Navratilova rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101010111233/http://www.martinafanpage.net/eng/titlesevert.html to http://www.martinafanpage.net/eng/titlesevert.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evert–Navratilova rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160505225646/http://www.wtatennis.com/head2head/player1/2188/player2/5744 to http://www.wtatennis.com/head2head/player1/2188/player2/5744

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]